Journal of Science Communication. Vol. 14, Issue 03, 2015
Editorial:
A question of (audience) reach. -- Emma Weitkamp.
Comment:
Beyond dissemination — science communication as impact. -- Laura Fogg-Rogers, Ana Margarida Sardo, Ann Grand.
1. Ships, Clocks & Stars: the quest for impact. -- Katherine McAlpine.
2. Beyond the dissemination of Earth Observation research: stakeholders’ and users’ involvement in project co-design. -- Alba L’Astorina, Irene Tomasoni, Anna Basoni, Paola Carrara.
3. Reflections on the impact of (playful) deliberation processes in contexts of responsible research and innovation. -- Marjoleine G. Van der Meij.
4. Evaluating impact and quality of experience in the 21st century: using technology to narrow the gap between science communication research and practice. -- Eric Jensen.
5. Moving beyond the seductive siren of reach: planning for the social and economic impacts emerging from school-university engagement with research. -- Richard Holliman, Gareth Davies.
Article:
Narrative risks in science writing for the lay public. -- Olav Muurlink, Peter McAllister.
Essay:
1. What is the “science of science communication”? -- Dan Kahan.
2. “Queue up, you stupid!”: communicating about technology problems. An exploratory study of warning messages posted on machines in public places. -- Beatrice Arbulla, Massimiano Bucchi.
3. RedPOP: 25 years of a Science Communication Network in Latin America. -- Luisa Massarani, Claudia Aguirre, Constanza Pedersoli, Elaine Reynoso Haynes, Luz Marina Lindegaard.
4. How to do mass media publicity for a neglected disease. Lessons from Tsetse and Trypanosomiasis in Kenya. -- Pamela Olet, Joseph Othieno.
5. Science journalism: the standardisation of information from the press to the internet. -- María Dolores Olvera-Lobo, Lourdes López-Pérez.
6. Highlighting the value of impact evaluation: enhancing informal science learning and public engagement theory and practice. -- Eric Jensen.
Letter:
A response to “Highlighting the value of impact evaluation: enhancing informal science learning and public engagement theory and practice” -- Heather King, Anna Lydia Svalastog.
Conference Review:
1. Let’s talk in Medellín: XIV RedPOP Congress “Art, Technology and Science: New ways to know” -- Martha Cambre.
2. World Conference of Science Journalists: what are they for? -- Javier Cruz-Mena.
A question of (audience) reach. -- Emma Weitkamp.
Comment:
Beyond dissemination — science communication as impact. -- Laura Fogg-Rogers, Ana Margarida Sardo, Ann Grand.
1. Ships, Clocks & Stars: the quest for impact. -- Katherine McAlpine.
2. Beyond the dissemination of Earth Observation research: stakeholders’ and users’ involvement in project co-design. -- Alba L’Astorina, Irene Tomasoni, Anna Basoni, Paola Carrara.
3. Reflections on the impact of (playful) deliberation processes in contexts of responsible research and innovation. -- Marjoleine G. Van der Meij.
4. Evaluating impact and quality of experience in the 21st century: using technology to narrow the gap between science communication research and practice. -- Eric Jensen.
5. Moving beyond the seductive siren of reach: planning for the social and economic impacts emerging from school-university engagement with research. -- Richard Holliman, Gareth Davies.
Article:
Narrative risks in science writing for the lay public. -- Olav Muurlink, Peter McAllister.
Essay:
1. What is the “science of science communication”? -- Dan Kahan.
2. “Queue up, you stupid!”: communicating about technology problems. An exploratory study of warning messages posted on machines in public places. -- Beatrice Arbulla, Massimiano Bucchi.
3. RedPOP: 25 years of a Science Communication Network in Latin America. -- Luisa Massarani, Claudia Aguirre, Constanza Pedersoli, Elaine Reynoso Haynes, Luz Marina Lindegaard.
4. How to do mass media publicity for a neglected disease. Lessons from Tsetse and Trypanosomiasis in Kenya. -- Pamela Olet, Joseph Othieno.
5. Science journalism: the standardisation of information from the press to the internet. -- María Dolores Olvera-Lobo, Lourdes López-Pérez.
6. Highlighting the value of impact evaluation: enhancing informal science learning and public engagement theory and practice. -- Eric Jensen.
Letter:
A response to “Highlighting the value of impact evaluation: enhancing informal science learning and public engagement theory and practice” -- Heather King, Anna Lydia Svalastog.
Conference Review:
1. Let’s talk in Medellín: XIV RedPOP Congress “Art, Technology and Science: New ways to know” -- Martha Cambre.
2. World Conference of Science Journalists: what are they for? -- Javier Cruz-Mena.
Jensen, Eric - Personal Name
Cambre, Martha - Personal Name
Olvera-Lobo, María Dolores - Personal Name
Olet, Pamela - Personal Name
Arbulla, Beatrice - Personal Name
Kahan, Dan - Personal Name
Muurlink, Olav - Personal Name
Holliman, Richard - Personal Name
Meij, Marjoleine G. Van der - Personal Name
L’Astorina, Alba - Personal Name
McAlpine, Katherine - Personal Name
Fogg-Rogers, Laura - Personal Name
King, Heather - Personal Name
Weitkamp, Emma - Personal Name
Massarani, Luisa - Personal Name
Cruz-Mena, Javier - Personal Name
Cambre, Martha - Personal Name
Olvera-Lobo, María Dolores - Personal Name
Olet, Pamela - Personal Name
Arbulla, Beatrice - Personal Name
Kahan, Dan - Personal Name
Muurlink, Olav - Personal Name
Holliman, Richard - Personal Name
Meij, Marjoleine G. Van der - Personal Name
L’Astorina, Alba - Personal Name
McAlpine, Katherine - Personal Name
Fogg-Rogers, Laura - Personal Name
King, Heather - Personal Name
Weitkamp, Emma - Personal Name
Massarani, Luisa - Personal Name
Cruz-Mena, Javier - Personal Name
Vol. 14, Issue 03, 2015
1824-2049
e-Journal IK
Inggris
SISSA Medialab
2015
Italy
LOADING LIST...
LOADING LIST...