Article
1.) “Science Festival” may not mean what we think it means: an analysis of how researchers and practitioners use this term. --J. Ross Ramsey and Todd Boyette
2.) The matter of complex anti-matter: the portrayal and framing of physics in Dutch newspapers. --Sanne Willemijn Kristensen, Julia Cramer, Alix McCollam, W. Gudrun Reijnierse and Ionica Smeets
3.) Follow the scientists? How beliefs about the practice of science shaped COVID-19 views. --Thomas G. Safford, Emily H. Whitmore and Lawrence C. Hamilton
4.) Exploration of social cues in technology-mediated science communication: a multidiscipline analysis on ‘Ask Me Anything (AMA)’ sessions in Reddit r/science. --Ying Tang, Jessica M. Abbazio, Khe Foon Hew and Noriko Hara
5.) Uniquely disgusting? Physiological disgust and attitudes toward GM food and other food and health technologies. --Sedona Chinn and Ariel Hasell
6.) Perceptions of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the work of science journalists: global perspectives. --Luisa Massarani, Luiz Felipe Fernandes Neves, Marta Entradas, Tim Lougheed and Martin W. Bauer
7.) Individual solutions to collective problems: the paradoxical treatment of environmental issues on Mexican and French YouTubers' videos. --Cecilia Lartigue, Guillaume Carbou and Muriel Lefebvre
8.) Understanding the relationship between sharing personal anecdotes, warmth, curiosity, risk perception and mitigation in communicating the threat of climate change. --Reyhaneh Maktoufi
9.) Experts, influencers, and amplifiers — Exploring climate movements' hyperlinking practices. --Frauke Rohden

Practice Insight
10.) Boundary spanners and thinking partners: adapting and expanding the research-practice partnership literature for public engagement with science (PES). --Karen Peterman, Sarah Garlick, John Besley, Sue Allen, Kathy Fallon Lambert, Nalini M. Nadkarni, Mark S. Rosin, Caitlin Weber, Marissa Weiss and Jen Wong